1/3/2023 0 Comments Virtavia a-6 fsx accelerationThey have a true IFOLS that is intregrated on the ship, so you can actually fly the meatball. You actually drop the launch bar and connect, then get shot off the pointy end of the ship. I am not sure how the catapult system works, but it works well. If you land long, you keep the airspeed and fly off the end of the deck. This means the sim actually looks for the tailhook to be down and contact the zone (it doesn't model individual wires) in order to arrest the aircraft. It has native "arresting zone" and catapult features. If you want a great carrier ops experience, here's how to do it:įirst, if you don't already have Acceleration, get it. The carriers also do not move over the ocean, which is possible in FSX and nice to have. They use a slew work around for the catapult launch. The IFOLS (meatball) is a 2D gauge that pops up on the side of the screen. You can also trap successfully without the hook down because it's all done by spoilers. This means even if you land long missing the wires, they will still slow you down just enough to dump you over the edge of the deck with zero airspeed. They instead make use of the "uber auto-spoiler" to slow you on the deck. The carriers as of the last version I tried (like I said, think it was 5, not 6) do not use native FSX Acceleration carrier features. Visual models are poor and VC's vary, but many aren't even clickable and have FS2002 graphics. Their flight dynamics do not allow for proper AOA to be flown, assuming you want to see the deck actually. The aircraft are overshadowed by most freeware aircraft even. I think Flight Deck 5 is the last I have any experience with, but they haven't changed almost anything since the first Flight Deck. STAY FAR FAR AWAY! Abacus products are among the worst there are and Flight Deck is no exception. Then I will tell you others but now I have no time. Guy I experiment also some default as: 1°) On my upper computer this which has Garmin 1000 or GPS about a certain time the Aircraft don't move and I am obliged to shut down and restart the GPS to have on the chart an aircraft alive. It's better than with Vista 64 Bits but I don't Use SLI and my last NVIDIA driver is 185.85. And with my computer no problem flying about Fl 300 I get about 50 FPS and on an Addon airport as LFBD about 13 FPS on ILS. I also use PMDG MD 11 and do not experiment gauges flashing. And the second monitor 1280 x1024 at bottom for gauges as wanted or necessary. Have a look to my cofiguration: it's an assembly computer: Proc = Intel core 2 Duo E 8600, Ram= 6Go PC 6400 800 MHZ 2 x 285 Graphic cards, 1 box Matrox triple head digital edition, 3 monitors 19" on the fisrt 285 GTX connected to Matrox and giving a 145 160° view of 3D panel of an aircraft and the scenery view (3840 x 1024), 2 monitors 19" on the second 285 GTX to have for one monitor 1280 x1024 on upper for overhead panel of a liner or gps of an vfr aircraft. Hi Donald, I am also testing FSX under Win 7 RC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |